When Donald J. Trump stood on the Capitol steps on January 20, 2025, for his second inauguration, the event landed on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, a juxtaposition as jarring as a discordant note in a familiar melody. For many, the moment symbolized a nation teetering on the edge—celebrating justice and equality on a day that also marked the return of an administration synonymous with division and authoritarianism. And yet, as history so often teaches us, moments of tension can be fertile ground for transformation.

In those turbulent years, a Zen parable began to circulate in whispered conversations and defiant declarations—the story of the farmer and the horse. When the farmer’s horse runs away, the neighbors lament his misfortune, to which he replies, “Maybe.” Days later, the horse returns, bringing wild companions, and the neighbors celebrate his good fortune. Again, he answers, “Maybe.” When his son breaks his leg taming one of the horses, the neighbors express their sympathy, and still, the farmer says, “Maybe.” Finally, when soldiers come to draft young men, the son’s injury spares him. The parable became a quiet anthem for those navigating Trump’s second term, a reminder that the events of the present—no matter how bleak—carry the seeds of future possibility.
The administration wasted no time enacting its agenda. Voting rights were further restricted under the guise of election integrity, environmental protections were rolled back to boost industries aligned with the administration’s interests, and federal agencies cracked down on dissent with expanded surveillance powers. Immigration policy became increasingly draconian, separating families and deporting thousands without due process. Public health resources were redirected toward privatized models that left the most vulnerable behind.
It seemed, on the surface, like the consolidation of an unyielding power. But as the Zen farmer might remind us, what appears to be a disaster can hold within it the potential for profound change.
The parable resonated deeply with those who refused to accept these policies as an unchangeable fate. Across the nation, grassroots organizers invoked the farmer’s wisdom, transforming despair into strategic action. They understood that resistance was not about reactive outrage but about deliberate, sustained effort. Communities that had long been marginalized found strength in their interconnectedness, pooling resources, skills, and energy to fight back.
Professional athletes became some of the most visible leaders in this wave of defiance. When federal voting restrictions disproportionately affected communities of color, the NBA Players’ Association called for a league-wide strike, refusing to take the court until voting protections were reinstated. Their actions inspired a domino effect: NFL and WNBA players joined in solidarity, and even international athletes spoke out, using their platforms to amplify calls for justice.
Teachers followed suit, staging walkouts not just for better pay but for equitable funding for underserved schools. Health care workers, burdened by collapsing infrastructure, organized free clinics in defiance of privatized models. Each act of defiance mirrored the farmer’s refusal to judge events prematurely; every strike, every protest, every boycott was a ripple sent into the wider system, reshaping it in unseen ways.
What the administration saw as chaos, the resistance recognized as opportunity. The policies that sought to impose rigid control inadvertently created cracks through which innovation and creativity flourished. Like the wild horses in the parable, these disruptions brought unexpected advantages. Local governments in progressive cities refused to enforce federal mandates, creating sanctuary zones where targeted communities could find safety. Libraries became hubs for organizing, offering workshops on activism and resilience.
Technology, often weaponized for surveillance, became a tool of subversion. Hacktivist groups exposed corruption, leaking documents that revealed the administration’s inner workings. Citizen scientists used open-source software to monitor environmental degradation, holding polluters accountable. Artists transformed public spaces into canvases of resistance, their murals and installations reminding communities of their shared strength.
And then there was the quiet power of silence. Faith communities of all kinds—churches, mosques, synagogues, and temples—held vigils that combined prayer with action. These gatherings became spaces of healing and planning, where people could grieve the present while envisioning the future. The parable of the farmer was often recited in these spaces, a reminder that the outcomes of today’s battles could not yet be known.
Perhaps the greatest lesson of the resistance was its refusal to mirror the administration’s tactics of fear and control. Rather than react with rage, organizers focused on building systems that could withstand oppression. They recognized that the farmer’s wisdom—“Maybe”—was not a resignation but an invitation to step back, assess, and adapt.
When federal agents labeled protests as acts of domestic terrorism, activists shifted to quieter forms of resistance. They organized mutual aid networks, ensuring that communities could survive and thrive even under oppressive policies. Public workers engaged in slowdowns, subtly disrupting systems without drawing immediate attention. It was a strategy of resilience rather than retaliation, designed not just to survive the administration but to outlast it.
By the end of Trump’s second term in 2029, the nation was not the same—but not in the way the administration had intended. Policies that sought to centralize power had instead ignited a movement that decentralized it, scattering seeds of resistance into every corner of the country. Communities became more connected, not less. Power was redistributed, not consolidated. And trust—fragile, hard-won, and deeply transformative—became the bedrock of a new social fabric.
Historians now call this era The Resilient Years. They teach it not as a cautionary tale but as a testament to what is possible when people refuse to judge events at face value. The strikes, the walkouts, the boycotts, and the quiet acts of defiance were all pieces of a larger mosaic—a story of people who chose to believe that even in the darkest times, there was room for hope, for growth, for change.
The farmer’s parable lives on as a reminder. What looks like calamity may bring new possibilities. What seems like victory may carry hidden costs. And what feels like chaos may be the beginning of a new kind of order, one built not on control but on connection. It teaches us that resilience is not just about surviving what comes—it’s about seeing the potential in every moment to create something new. In those years, that wisdom carried a nation through its trials, turning despair into a foundation for collective transformation.
Comments